TIGed

Switch headers Switch to TIGweb.org

Are you an TIG Member?
Click here to switch to TIGweb.org


Home Community Discussion BoardsIssuesHuman Rightsfirearms rights

« BACK TO FORUM

Discussion Boards Guidelines Discussion Board Guidelines
FAQ

Author
Post
wayne

Joined: Mar 21, 2012
Posts: 1 (view all)
Poster Rank: Tongue-tied
User is Offline



Province/State: Arizona
City: Tucson
firearms rights
May 1, 2012

The ultimate question would it be safer in the United states with or without fire arms. from the information I have seen that anywhere from 100,000 or more crimes are stopped due to firearms. In 2010 600 accidental firearms deaths occurred but in proportion its vastly out weighed when you have the 11,000 or so that where killed by homicide by firearms .Most research that i found showed that 80% of guns from crimes are obtained illegally.

I would really enjoy others thoughts!!!

back to top  |   link to this post
Member Profile wsharp PROFILE TIG Messenger TIG MESSENGER
Jennifer

Joined: Apr 27, 2012
Posts: 25 (view all)
Poster Rank: Talkative
User is Offline

Country: United Kingdom
Province/State: Cornwall
City: Penzance
Re: firearms rights
May 4, 2012

It's not my place to say what is or isn't proper for the USA. The right to bear arms is embedded in your constitution, and the weapons manufacturers who control many politicians over there make sure it stays that way.

All I can say is that, we would not want to relax our firearms controls in Great Britain.

We do have firearms crime here, that is not disputed. More gangs are turning to guns for street conflicts, but they use them amongst themselves in rival gang feuds and it rarely impacts on the community in general (although there have been some tragic instances of innocent people being caught in crossfire. It is still very rare, though).

I think the problem of gun ownership is largely one of perception. If I ask myself: Why would I, a British citizen, want to own a gun..? There is no reason that I can think of.

However if I lived in the US, I might think I needed one because other people have them and I must defend myself. There's the difference.

Where I live, the general population do not have guns and therefore nobody lives in fear of them. It is true that there could be a rifle wielding maniac about to run berserk in the high street, but that's an extremely unlikely scenario and is not worth arming myself 24/7 for.

If the gun laws here were relaxed, that could make people think differently. For a start, there would be a section of society who see the gun restrictions abolished and think: "Hey, the government says its ok to have a gun. I'm going to go out and buy one".

Sending out that sort of message to the public would be an extremely irresponsible and dangerous thing for any government to do.

Then, when a certain section of society owns guns, then others may start to become concerned enough to believe that, actually, they DO need to arm themselves in self defence. This is cause and effect.

In this way, weapons on the street would proliferate and it would inevitably lead to shootings that would simply never have been possible when the citizenry were unarmed.

It is probably impossible to disarm the American people. Guns are a part of your society and you have to live with them. If you're comfortable with that, then who am I to argue..?

But we don't want mass gun ownership in this country. People who don't have guns, can't shoot anybody.

It's that simple.... it really is.

.


back to top  |   link to this post
Member Profile Jennifer1984 PROFILE TIG Messenger TIG MESSENGER
Display posts from:

« BACK TO FORUM

Forum Jump:




All times are GMT-05:00

» Check that you are logged in!

You cannot create new threads in this forum
You cannot post replies in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot edit/delete your posts in this forum
Administrators: anuriandima84, faviolag, FraserMc, JenniferV, JulieGao, Liamjod, senahussain
Moderators: danieln25, darhcik, janepe, Liamjod