Join TakingITGlobal

Home Community Discussion BoardsIssuesTechnologyNASA Space Exploration

« BACK TO FORUM

Discussion Boards Guidelines Discussion Board Guidelines
FAQ

Author
Post
David

Joined: Mar 23, 2011
Posts: 1 (view all)
Poster Rank: Tongue-tied
User is Offline



Province/State: Missouri
City: Springfield
NASA Space Exploration
March 23, 2011 - 11:33 AM

I have been thinking about this for a really long time, and want to know what you guys think. Space exploration costs millions of dollers each year, with the price of all the gasoline needed to fuel each shuttle launch and other equipment in the International Space Station. Do you think that we should stop funding for space eploration and use that money for something else like paying off the US debt?

back to top  |   link to this post
Member Profile DavidE PROFILE TIG Messenger TIG MESSENGER
Benjamin

Joined: Mar 28, 2011
Posts: 2 (view all)
Poster Rank: Tongue-tied
User is Offline

Gender & Age: Male, 20
Country: United States
Province/State: New York
City: Chappaqua
Re: NASA Space Exploration
March 29, 2011 - 02:05 PM

If we give up our campaigns to explore past our planet, I feel that we may never reinstitute NASA or other space programs. Human beings have historically always been very curious explorers, migrating throughout every region of the globe. We may over populate, and the theory that in thousands of years human beings will need to colonize the moon or another planet to support the population is a little bogus but may be completely possible. Also, space informs us a lot about science that we originally never understood. But it is very dangerous to explore tspace. Objects traveling at speeds exceeding 50k miles per hour are always whizzing around damaging space crafts. Also, radiation and other high speed traveling substances penetrate astronauts nearly every manned mission in space. Manned missions are very dangerous and an emphasis on unmanned missions should be the future of space exploration. As for our unrenewable resource of space rocket fuel, a new renewable type of fuel should be developed to propell rockets out of earths gravitational field. It is easy to "speed up" objects in space with zero gravity. In the future, we may be able to manipulate space and time, making propelling objects via combustion a "transportational practice" of the past. If we can bend space and time, we can transport our selves from point a to point b MUCH quicker and cost effective.
If we give up space exploration, we give up the future of humanity.


back to top  |   link to this post
Member Profile benorbitz PROFILE TIG Messenger TIG MESSENGER
Mike

Joined: Mar 29, 2011
Posts: 71 (view all)
Poster Rank: Talkative
User is Offline

Age: 35
Country: United States
Re: NASA Space Exploration
May 9, 2011 - 01:48 AM

In my opinion, the manned space exploration program is absolutely worth the cost. It’s not just about what we learn out there in space, or about ourselves, or how to be a better steward of precious Earth. It’s about how we live here on Earth together and what type of future we want for ourselves and children.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Absolute Steel— Steel building and carport kits with nationwide jobsite delivery. Easy DIY—America’s easiest to install building system. Watch the video & see for yourself.


back to top  |   link to this post
Member Profile siddle PROFILE TIG Messenger TIG MESSENGER
authority216

Joined: Nov 9, 2010
Posts: 17 (view all)
Poster Rank: Talkative
User is Offline

Age: 29
Country: United Kingdom
Province/State: London, City of
City: London
Re: NASA Space Exploration
August 18, 2011 - 08:54 AM

I think they have realised the same as you - no more space shuttle!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
canvas art print


back to top  |   link to this post
Member Profile authority216 PROFILE TIG Messenger TIG MESSENGER
Keith Barrett

Joined: Sep 6, 2011
Posts: 3 (view all)
Poster Rank: Tongue-tied
User is Offline

Country: United Kingdom
Province/State: Hampshire
City: Winchester
Re: NASA Space Exploration
September 6, 2011 - 05:22 AM

I think there's a balance to be struck here definitely. How much do we really get back for the money that's spent on space exploration.

I say "we", but in reality I think it's US taxpayers who have mainly been footing the bill.

As far as I'm aware, the UK does get involved in European space operations, but I must admit that I don't know the exact funding details.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A search engine optimisation expert - but don't hold that against me!


back to top  |   link to this post
Member Profile kbarrettssc PROFILE TIG Messenger TIG MESSENGER
Robin Williams

Joined: Sep 19, 2011
Posts: 33 (view all)
Poster Rank: Talkative
User is Offline

Country: United States
Province/State: Utah
City: Holladay
Re: NASA Space Exploration
November 10, 2011 - 03:59 AM

NASA Space Exploration worth the cost. We have seen how scientific research consistently leaves a trail of useful technology in its wake. Space exploration is the most productive of all the sciences. The settlement of space would benefit all of humanity by opening a new frontier, energizing our society and providing resources for the growth of the human race without wrecking the Earth.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
online payday loan


back to top  |   link to this post
Member Profile cashone PROFILE TIG Messenger TIG MESSENGER
Display posts from:

« BACK TO FORUM

Forum Jump:




All times are GMT-05:00

» Check that you are logged in!

You cannot create new threads in this forum
You cannot post replies in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot edit/delete your posts in this forum
Administrators: anuriandima84, KathrynSabo, Liamjod, senahussain
Moderators: KathrynSabo, Liamjod, senahussain