Join TakingITGlobal

Home Community Discussion BoardsFeatured ForumCurrent Eventsworld war 3

« BACK TO FORUM

Discussion Boards Guidelines Discussion Board Guidelines
FAQ

Author
Post
michael alves

Joined: Jan 23, 2009
Posts: 6 (view all)
Poster Rank: Soft-spoken
User is Offline

Gender & Age: Male & 18
Country: United States
Province/State: Ohio
City: Sheffield Lake
world war 3
February 17, 2009 - 09:38 AM

what would happen if the war on terrism grew

back to top  |   link to this post
Member Profile mich869 PROFILE TIG Messenger TIG MESSENGER
TH

Joined: Feb 14, 2009
Posts: 8 (view all)
Poster Rank: Soft-spoken
User is Offline

Gender & Age: Male, 29
Country: United States
Province/State: District of Columbia
City: Washington
Re: world war 3
February 17, 2009 - 10:01 PM

well, terrorism is basically the democratization of war, so the war on terror would probably be states against armed NGOs. I don't think it could get to the point of world war before a majority would vote for a change.


back to top  |   link to this post
Member Profile thehegemonist PROFILE TIG Messenger TIG MESSENGER
Andrew

Joined: Dec 15, 2008
Posts: 35 (view all)
Poster Rank: Talkative
User is Offline

Gender & Age: Male, 51
Country: United Kingdom
City: Epsom
Re: world war 3
March 5, 2009 - 07:12 AM


thehegemonist wrote:

well, terrorism is basically the democratization of war, so the war on terror would probably be states against armed NGOs. I don't think it could get to the point of world war before a majority would vote for a change.


America invented modern warfare during the Civil War. It is fought in a cost effective manner now, you can profit from the sale of arms and munitions, medical supplies and provisions but you can make a real profit from the rebuilding. Your nation will be viewed very negatively when the perspective of history is trained upon it in the future. That is if America doesn't succeed in dragging us all into nuclear oblivion.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Andy ehwhiteboy


back to top  |   link to this post
Member Profile ehwhiteboy PROFILE TIG Messenger TIG MESSENGER
TH

Joined: Feb 14, 2009
Posts: 8 (view all)
Poster Rank: Soft-spoken
User is Offline

Gender & Age: Male, 29
Country: United States
Province/State: District of Columbia
City: Washington
Re: world war 3
March 5, 2009 - 10:02 PM

I don't think I mentioned America, so it seems a bit harsh to use that diatribe as a response.

I do disagree with your comment of course. I mean, the UK conquered half the world, and people still think favorably of it. Under American hegemony, there are no colonies, and the majority of countries are democracies. We're not perfect but we're far from monsters.


back to top  |   link to this post
Member Profile thehegemonist PROFILE TIG Messenger TIG MESSENGER
Andrew

Joined: Dec 15, 2008
Posts: 35 (view all)
Poster Rank: Talkative
User is Offline

Gender & Age: Male, 51
Country: United Kingdom
City: Epsom
Re: world war 3
March 6, 2009 - 07:36 AM

No you didn't mention America, but how can the rest of the world ignore American input/interference? I see you chose the old 2 wrongs make a right argument as though what Britain did 70 years ago somehow justifies what America is doing right now. How come your ex vice president is linked to companies that have profited hugely from Iraqi suffering, or how Iraqi oil will be used to compensate America? This isn't a rant against America, it is factual discourse of real world events. Next the Jews will be demanding compensation for the fact that the 400 children they killed in Gaza has traumatised them (to used your skewed logic)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Andy ehwhiteboy


back to top  |   link to this post
Member Profile ehwhiteboy PROFILE TIG Messenger TIG MESSENGER
Stephane

Joined: Mar 4, 2009
Posts: 29 (view all)
Poster Rank: Talkative
User is Offline

Gender & Age: Male, 18
Country: Canada
Province/State: British Columbia
City: Nanaimo
Re: world war 3
March 7, 2009 - 02:42 PM

this IS interesting...
perhaps I'll get out of the way before the two sides start to form up behind their barricades and start bombarding each other with philosophical bullets and moral clusterbombs.
OR, you can try to see the world from the other person's view.
your choice


back to top  |   link to this post
Member Profile Taihus PROFILE TIG Messenger TIG MESSENGER
Benos 3rd

Joined: Jul 17, 2008
Posts: 20 (view all)
Poster Rank: Talkative
User is Offline

Gender & Age: Male, 2011
Country: Zambia
Province/State: Lusaka
City: Lusaka
Re: world war 3
March 10, 2009 - 08:02 AM

Its interesting how America has managed to errase history off the world's minds, who would believe that back in history Americans were once terrorists in the UK? But the way they are stressing terrorism by the Arabs is way too much, especially punishing even innocent Arabs that are only suspects and thought to look like terrorists. I don't know how a terrorist looks like, anyway i might be wrong maybe they have special features different from normal humans.
But all in all i don't see potential of a world war three, i think we have strong voices around the world and responsible leaders e.g The Queen of Britain, Mr. Obama, Mr. Sacholzy etc. I think the fire can be put off before spreading to the whole world.


back to top  |   link to this post
Member Profile benoselias PROFILE TIG Messenger TIG MESSENGER
Display posts from:

« BACK TO FORUM

Forum Jump:




All times are GMT-05:00

» Check that you are logged in!

You cannot create new threads in this forum
You cannot post replies in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot edit/delete your posts in this forum
Administrators: anuriandima84, Liamjod, senahussain, tayenglish
Moderators: anuriandima84, Liamjod, senahussain, TalaNa, tayenglish