expat
Inscrit le: Jan 27, 2008
Messages: 29
Rang de l'auteur:
Bavard
L'usager est
Hors ligne
|
Art of racial Discrimination, Judicial Crisis caused by HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
February 12, 2008 - 11:11 PM
|
|
Special Rapporteur of the Commission on Human Rights on the Independence of Judges and Lawyers (urgent-action@ohchr.org) and ask them to register the attached petition so that it can be assessed for admissibility and merit.
This is a test case for equal access to the legal system for all Australia. As opinioned by HIGH COURT Judge Hayne, apparently Australian with SouthEast Asian Heritage, can not have their cases heard in the HIGH COURT under Australian Constitution; The Underlying case is HUMAN RIGHTS violation from HREOC and HREOC president John von Doussa, matter as sent to the Special Rapporteur of the Commission on Human Rights on the Independence of Judges and Lawyers (urgent-action@ohchr.org). I ask that you do it to make the UN HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL relevant and accountable to the various mandates under it, quoting the date and name PHAM
How effective is the new UN HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL'S SPECIAL PROCEDURES for petitions against HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS this case will test it out and a way for others to use for remedies http://rapidshare.com/files/90317709/OHCHR.24January2008.web.pdf.html
http://kangaroocourtaustralia.com
Form 1 Notice of a constitutional matter
(rule 5.01.3)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA No. of
[ MELBOURNE OFFICE OF THE ] REGISTRY
BETWEEN:
CP
Plaintiff
and
The Hon Kenneth Madison Hayne Defendants
Judge, High Court of Australia
Major General Michael Jeffery
AC CVO MC
Governor
General (Commonwealth of Australia)
NOTICE OF A CONSTITUTIONAL
MATTER
1. The Plaintiff gives notice that this proceeding involves a
matter arising under the Constitution or involving its interpretation within
the meaning of Section 78B of the Judiciary Act 1903 .
2. [ State the nature of the matter
(e.g., the constitutional issue which is said to arise). ]
a. A matter arising under The
Constitution or involving its interpretation within the meaning of section 78B
of the Judiciary Act 1903: whether the Affidavits and the sworn Statements of
Australian Citizens of Southeast Asian descent are less valid and of less legal
significance than the lies and fabrication of other Australians and the
Commonwealth of Australia;
b. Human Rights and Equal Opportunity
Act (HREOA) 1986 (Cth): whether Australia has obligations under International Convention on Civil and Politcal Rights and other
International Human Rights charters make it unlawful to deprive Australian
citizens access to the laws and legal process and to basic Human Rights;
c.
Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth): whether Australia has obligations
under International Convention
on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination and whether Commonwealth laws (HREOA and RDA) make it
unlawful to discriminate and treat differently based on race; and whether the
Judiciary is exempt from them;
http://kangaroocourtaustralia.com
http://rapidshare.com/files/89785293/IN_THE_HIGH_COURT_OF_AUSTRALIA.Constitutional.05february2008.web.pdf.html
http://rapidshare.com/files/89785593/IN_THE_HIGH_COURT_OF_AUSTRALIA.Mandamus.05february2008.web.pdf.html
|
Accueil
Communauté
Auteur
Afficher
